Forum Topics
Male Performer Chat: Reviews
Created by:
phil_usa
2/10/12 @ 5:31pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Driving Down Thunder Road
Posts: 4,747
Created by:
ronnie-uk
4/23/12 @ 10:05am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,381
I visited a model on April 21. He was working his socks off in Party Chat but only 2 of us were tipping. I then noticed that these are the 3 most recent reviews on his bio page:
kona4fun on April 18, 2012 wrote: LIEING CHEATING SCAM ARTIST, , IVE SEEN HIM RIP OFF MANY GUYS IN GROUP AND NOT PERFORM... DONT WAST YOUR CREDITS
Phil_USA on April 5, 2012 wrote: I saw him in a party chat, he was certainly willing to do a lot more, but the tips just were not there. He is really cute, has a hot body, a great smile and a pleasing personality. I recommend a visit to his room.
ronnie-uk on March 31, 2012 wrote: Enjoyed a great value Group Chat today with *****, in which he delivered exactly as promised. Hot!
There have been suggestions in this topic that VS tend not to approve negative reviews. In this case the latest review seems to be nasty and malicious, and I don't think it should have been approved. If there was a forum topic about this model - I am deliberately not mentioning his name - and this review was posted in that topic I think it would have been automatically removed.
Not sure now whether I should:
a. do nothing
b. send a message to the model
c. send a message to VS.
Quote
kona4fun on April 18, 2012 wrote: LIEING CHEATING SCAM ARTIST, , IVE SEEN HIM RIP OFF MANY GUYS IN GROUP AND NOT PERFORM... DONT WAST YOUR CREDITS
Phil_USA on April 5, 2012 wrote: I saw him in a party chat, he was certainly willing to do a lot more, but the tips just were not there. He is really cute, has a hot body, a great smile and a pleasing personality. I recommend a visit to his room.
ronnie-uk on March 31, 2012 wrote: Enjoyed a great value Group Chat today with *****, in which he delivered exactly as promised. Hot!
There have been suggestions in this topic that VS tend not to approve negative reviews. In this case the latest review seems to be nasty and malicious, and I don't think it should have been approved. If there was a forum topic about this model - I am deliberately not mentioning his name - and this review was posted in that topic I think it would have been automatically removed.
Not sure now whether I should:
a. do nothing
b. send a message to the model
c. send a message to VS.
Quote
Created by:
lickau
4/23/12 @ 10:21am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Moving slowly but surely somewhere sometime
Posts: 29,285
Phil_USA on April 5, 2012 wrote: I saw him in a party chat, he was certainly willing to do a lot more, but the tips just were not there. He is really cute, has a hot body, a great smile and a pleasing personality. I recommend a visit to his room.
ronnie-uk on March 31, 2012 wrote: Enjoyed a great value Group Chat today with *****, in which he delivered exactly as promised. Hot!
There have been suggestions in this topic that VS tend not to approve negative reviews. In this case the latest review seems to be nasty and malicious, and I don't think it should have been approved. If there was a forum topic about this model - I am deliberately not mentioning his name - and this review was posted in that topic I think it would have been automatically removed.
Not sure now whether I should:
a. do nothing
b. send a message to the model
c. send a message to VS.
Write to VS if concerned .
They have removed some reviews that had Emails , Phone numbers , and harrassment of models in the past .
The model cannot remove it .
Quote
i ask for reviews every time I'm on. it keeps me knowing they like what i do
Quote
Created by:
ronnie-uk
4/25/12 @ 9:36am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,381
Write to VS if concerned .
They have removed some reviews that had Emails , Phone numbers , and harrassment of models in the past .
The model cannot remove it .
Thanks for your advice, LickaU.
I decided to bring the nasty review to the attention of the model first and then VS. Both were grateful, and the review has now been removed from the model's bio page.
Quote
I think it's important to leave a review about a model it let's other members what to expect and two let's a model know that that you liked him enough to say something nice about him and that you like his performance
Quote
Created by:
ronnie-uk
7/18/12 @ 12:07pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,381
In the first case, Yeray titled the VOD "Big Load Cum Creamy". A review was added by Romanov which included the words "No wonder he did not cum". I was puzzled, because I have always found Yeray to be a helpful, friendly performer. Yeray was quite right and Romanov was quite wrong. I added my own review to help to put things right. The VOD is at:
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/shows/4793005/
Romanov does it again. The following VOD has just been added to the Best VOD Cum Shots topic. Romanov's review quite wrongly states that the cum shot is faked.
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/shows/5873023/
There are concerns about fake cum shots on this site, but I think it is quite irresponsible for anyone to suggest a cum shot is faked when it is clearly genuine (and, in this case, quite spectactular).
Quote
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/shows/4793005/
Romanov does it again. The following VOD has just been added to the Best VOD Cum Shots topic. Romanov's review quite wrongly states that the cum shot is faked.
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/shows/5873023/
There are concerns about fake cum shots on this site, but I think it is quite irresponsible for anyone to suggest a cum shot is faked when it is clearly genuine (and, in this case, quite spectactular).
Quote
It's okay ronnie, don't allow that particular reviewer to get your knickers in a bunch. He only has one benchmark for grading a private show; no cum = no good. Well the connoisseur of cum shots isn't always on his game and has been sold false goods at least once himself. Awhile back I remember seeing in the VIP dailies a VOD where he reviewed a show. He mentioned he was the original customer of the pvt and that the cum shot was great. Another reviewer added that it was spit and even said the time in the show when the "shot" occurred. I watched and it was quite clear the shot was fake. I guess "in the moment" he missed that little trick. That stuck with me because he is always going on about how bad a show is if the model doesn't cum. It was funny to see he can be fooled too. If pressed I could waste some time and find the show but I decided a long time ago to disregard that reviewers remarks.
Quote
Created by:
phil_usa
7/19/12 @ 9:11am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Driving Down Thunder Road
Posts: 4,747
...I am the one who nominated the REAL cum shot for the category of "Best VOD Cum Shots", it was so clearly real and yet he for some unknown reason proclaimed it to be "fake". I am glad that I decided to watch the VOD and could correct the mistaken comment.
...Writing wrong information for a review can be harmful because it may lead to having fewer views by members who are looking for the cum shot. Quote
Romanov does it again. The following VOD has just been added to the Best VOD Cum Shots topic. Romanov's review quite wrongly states that the cum shot is faked.
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/shows/5873023/
There are concerns about fake cum shots on this site, but I think it is quite irresponsible for anyone to suggest a cum shot is faked when it is clearly genuine (and, in this case, quite spectactular).
The cum shot in the VOD was hot and definitely real. Stephon has been a model here for several years and ALWAYS shoots a real nice load for his fans
Quote
...Writing wrong information for a review can be harmful because it may lead to having fewer views by members who are looking for the cum shot.
Quite true Phil, especially when they say the model can be difficult. This could turn potential clients away. It is also another common comment from the "cumoisseur". I've found his reviews to shows of models I have visited and find these models both friendly and accommodating. Some of them say they want to cum for me, which is always appreciated. My guess is he must be ordering models to cum over and over again in a single show and they find that annoying. A bad reputation from a false review can be a hurdle for good models to overcome. Quote
Created by:
phil_usa
7/23/12 @ 4:31pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Driving Down Thunder Road
Posts: 4,747
Created by:
ronnie-uk
7/23/12 @ 5:46pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,381
Yes, Phil. Romanov seems to not only give harmful and inaccurate reviews, but he tries to discourage good reviews as well.
I was thinking of drawing these last few posts to the attention of VS. There might be scope for a little bit more monitoring of reviews and reviewers.
Quote
I was thinking of drawing these last few posts to the attention of VS. There might be scope for a little bit more monitoring of reviews and reviewers.
Quote
Annotation from an (in this matter) outside observer:
What drives these guys to make such comments?
Bis Quote
What drives these guys to make such comments?
Bis Quote
Created by:
phil_usa
7/24/12 @ 9:20am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Driving Down Thunder Road
Posts: 4,747
...This show featuring Kc Coxx may be the all time most reviewed show!! 19 reviews (1 double) so actually 18 reviews.
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/shows/5901503/ Quote
Must admit I've always rather ignored, brief or negative reviews - "jerking no cum" "cock not even hard" "boring just talking" I mean written in a different way "jerking no cum" could be "Sensuous slow jerking, "insert models name here" undulating erotically whilst staring straight at the camera and winking sexily with his come hither eyes, flashing his cheeky grin as he moans in pleasure".
I tend to take a lot of notice of a well written review by a member whose previous reviews I have seen which give a proper feel for what the VOD was all about. The more that you see such reviews (and there are several members who have commented on this thread who always write excellent reviews of shows) the more I'm likely to look. To a certain extent you trust reviews by those who've earned your trust previously.
As the chap who came up to me in the street today and asked for 10 as he'd just got a call and his wife was in hospital having their baby and he needed to get a cab to be there said "It all boils down to trust in the end". Quote
I tend to take a lot of notice of a well written review by a member whose previous reviews I have seen which give a proper feel for what the VOD was all about. The more that you see such reviews (and there are several members who have commented on this thread who always write excellent reviews of shows) the more I'm likely to look. To a certain extent you trust reviews by those who've earned your trust previously.
As the chap who came up to me in the street today and asked for 10 as he'd just got a call and his wife was in hospital having their baby and he needed to get a cab to be there said "It all boils down to trust in the end". Quote
Created by:
phil_usa
8/9/12 @ 10:35am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Driving Down Thunder Road
Posts: 4,747
...He strikes yet again!! A show with Jake D, the cum shot is clearly seen at 6:13 and his body has cum all over it. I don't understand what Romanov watched.
http://www.flirt4free.com/vod/view.php?a=view&recording_id=5760285& Quote
...He strikes yet again!!
You know what they did with the Romanovs after the October-Revolution, dont you?
Quote
Created by:
phil_usa
8/20/12 @ 9:31am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Driving Down Thunder Road
Posts: 4,747
...I was watching some daliy VODs this morning when I noticed one member was writing 4 reviews for every VOD that I watched. I guess it's not against the policy of VS, but perhaps it should be.
Here is just one example.http://www.flirt4free.com/vip/members/daily-vod.php?a=view&recording_id=6038931 Quote
