Example 1: Consent and negotiation are compelte. A Mistress bends over the kitchen counter and instructs her submissive to paddle her ass with nice long, deep thuddy strokes. Here, the Mistress is taking the traditional position of the bottom (i.e. receiving spanks) and the bottom is taking the traditional role of the Top (i.e. giving spanks) BUT the Mistress is still in control of the scene (i.e. commanding the spanks to be given). So the Mistress is ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’. Another example could be when a Mistress instructs her sub to give her a foot massage.
Example 2: Consent and negotiation are complete. The Mistress instructs her sub to clean and complete necessary chores within the house, like discussed. The sub back talks his Mistress, refusing to do the chores on the grounds that he just doesn’t want to, even after he’s already negotiated to worship and serve her. This could also be considered ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’ because the submissive is attempting to control the scene even after negotiating his servitude to the Mistress. In this light, Topping from the bottom is seen as a criticism of an unruly submissive.
What is your opinion on ‘Topping’ from the ‘bottom’? Do you approve of the idea? Why or why not? Do you have a different definition? Please share with us your thoughts on this kinky concept Quote
Quote
10/4/16 @ 3:09pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Spain, longing for Denmark
Posts: 2,447
More so, I love to be a bit rebellish and to provoke my master's anger. Love to resist and then beg even more for my desires. Quote
Quote
7/12/17 @ 5:14pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Kneeling devotedly at Miss L's feet
Posts: 1,297