Forum Topics
Female Performer Chat: Who is your favorite model and why?
Created by:
dudley_do_ride
5/23/12 @ 9:34am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: hain't Pochipsie son
Posts: 3,267
More development:
Lemna 286 - Let L (p, t) be the lobotomization operator acting on model p at time t. This is a classic example of a noncomutative operator.
L(p, t1) O(p, t2) is not the same as O(p,t1) L(p, t2) where O is any other operator. In fact L takes a model from set s and places she/he permenently into set Odear, at least until ganglia synthesis theory develops more fully. The uze of L of course is now restricted to evil doctors and novelists which is one clear sign of mankind's great progress.
Similary the set s is not closed under addition. p1 + p2 = pZ is not a member of s. If it lives it is definately in set Z which can only be exited via double k1ll. And p1 - p2 makes no sense at all unless they were in some kind of relationship.
Set s is considered minimal when set W, those who observe s, are fully satisfied with the minimal number of elements in s.
Set s is considered loud when the number of elements of s becomes so large that the sound of it causes earthquakes in regions of relatively high tectonic stress.
You'll notice the odd use of case in the theory. Set s is lower and set W is upper. When you have progresssed further we can disclose this higher meaning as well.
Quote
Lemna 286 - Let L (p, t) be the lobotomization operator acting on model p at time t. This is a classic example of a noncomutative operator.
L(p, t1) O(p, t2) is not the same as O(p,t1) L(p, t2) where O is any other operator. In fact L takes a model from set s and places she/he permenently into set Odear, at least until ganglia synthesis theory develops more fully. The uze of L of course is now restricted to evil doctors and novelists which is one clear sign of mankind's great progress.
Similary the set s is not closed under addition. p1 + p2 = pZ is not a member of s. If it lives it is definately in set Z which can only be exited via double k1ll. And p1 - p2 makes no sense at all unless they were in some kind of relationship.
Set s is considered minimal when set W, those who observe s, are fully satisfied with the minimal number of elements in s.
Set s is considered loud when the number of elements of s becomes so large that the sound of it causes earthquakes in regions of relatively high tectonic stress.
You'll notice the odd use of case in the theory. Set s is lower and set W is upper. When you have progresssed further we can disclose this higher meaning as well.
Quote
Created by:
amanda_fucking_palmer
5/24/12 @ 2:43am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: yeah baby ... i'm faking it again
Posts: 1,793
anyone need me to answer? Didn't think so (grinz)
Quote
Created by:
dan_in_florida
5/24/12 @ 12:21pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Sunny South Florida - with a REALLY cool car :-)
Posts: 1,501
Created by:
amanda_fucking_palmer
5/24/12 @ 3:39pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: yeah baby ... i'm faking it again
Posts: 1,793
