More development:

Lemna 286 - Let L (p, t) be the lobotomization operator acting on model p at time t. This is a classic example of a noncomutative operator.

L(p, t1) O(p, t2) is not the same as O(p,t1) L(p, t2) where O is any other operator. In fact L takes a model from set s and places she/he permenently into set Odear, at least until ganglia synthesis theory develops more fully. The uze of L of course is now restricted to evil doctors and novelists which is one clear sign of mankind's great progress.

Similary the set s is not closed under addition. p1 + p2 = pZ is not a member of s. If it lives it is definately in set Z which can only be exited via double k1ll. And p1 - p2 makes no sense at all unless they were in some kind of relationship.

Set s is considered minimal when set W, those who observe s, are fully satisfied with the minimal number of elements in s.

Set s is considered loud when the number of elements of s becomes so large that the sound of it causes earthquakes in regions of relatively high tectonic stress.

You'll notice the odd use of case in the theory. Set s is lower and set W is upper. When you have progresssed further we can disclose this higher meaning as well.



Quote

anyone need me to answer? Didn't think so (grinz) Quote

anyone need me to answer? Didn't think so (grinz)



Nice to see ya back Quote

Nice to see ya back


(kiss) hi Dan you are ALWAYS in my mind ... surrounded by happiness.
Quote